1
Dispatch → Meta → Reference
BACK UP - Opinion of the Tribunal | Case 001 | On Oaths of Office
Opinion of the Tribunal | Case 001 | On Oaths of Office
Ruling
The Oath of Office you take when you take office lasts for as long as the individual under oath remains in that position, without breaks.
To clarify, I will use Supreme Harbinger AlkseriaI for example. If they are to take their oath as according to law following getting elected in the January election, this oath would last until they no longer were in office. However, if they were to resign, and then rejoin the Tribunal later, that would mean that they would have to retake the oath. The Tribunal would like to clarify that the oath still remains in effect should an officer take a temporary break, assuming they return to the position without losing it in an election or being dismissed.
The Oath of Office does not have to be taken again at the start of each term, assuming it has been previously taken in their tenure.
To clarify, this stipulation only takes effect should the officer in question be serving consecutive terms. To return to our example of Supreme Harbinger AlkseariaI, assuming they are elected in January and take their oath, if they are reelected in March, May, and July, they do not have to retake the oath each election. However, if they are to be elected in January, take their oath, fail to be reelected in March, but get reelected in May, they will have to retake their oath, as they did not occupy the office.
Reasoning
The Celestial Order of Astoria