by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .27,55927,56027,56127,56227,56327,56427,565. . .28,21328,214»

Post self-deleted by The Mecix Molls.

I do not know any animes you say

I feel weird

Arctic Lands wrote:NATO is not an aggressor, but still evil for their economic sanctions against Russia. Have they traded with us like "partners", Russia may have even joined the EU at some point. But war is more profitable, i guess.

Putin absolutely would've supported integrating Russia with the West as he did when he first got power lol

Triple allience wrote:Are you hearing yourself too ?

Like you told factions want the power

Exactly

If you'll excuse me, I'm Preparing to Invade Europe for "Business"

Syndicasia wrote:Literally anyone with a brain would see what Saddam did to the Kurds as an important criticism of him, and realize that he had no interest in ending any misery.

So it's genocide I gues.

Syndicasia wrote:Putin absolutely would've supported integrating Russia with the West as he did when he first got power lol

Okay Mr. Galloway

Jewish Partisan Division wrote:Makhno started off as a peasant who was another victim of the bourgeoisie. The peasantry at the time were victims of attempts by the russian tsar to assimilate them into russian culture as the tsarist government saw ukraine as another part of russia. There's a reason why Makhnovists offensives were so successful, its because the makhnovists addressed several problems in Ukraine groups like the whites and reds caused and refused to address. (Apart from the whites under Wrangel.) It was literally an army of the people.

Makhnovshchina's biggest problem is that there was no form of authority to counter The Black Army. So if Makhno wanted to be a dictator, he totally could just undermine the government. Though this could be because the soviets did not have enough time to decentralize.

Peasants struggle against the old ruling classes of the aristocracy and monarchy as they aspire to become free rural petty bourgeoisie themselves, which is what happened under Maoist China.

Although, it is worth noting that they will hate big capital much like how small businesses do because big capital tries to outcompete small capital

Arestastland wrote:
So it's genocide I gues.

Does not genocide mean killing a whole race ?

Arestastland wrote:So it's genocide I gues.

Yes

Post self-deleted by Wonsen.

Triple allience wrote:Does not genocide mean killing a whole race ?

No, it means to mass kill people of the same origins.

Goodbye to you all

Syndicasia wrote:Putin absolutely would've supported integrating Russia with the West as he did when he first got power lol

I wonder what inspired such a change of heart. Please don't say "powertripping", I heard that from countless Russian liberals I used to watch (Arctic Lands was originally intended to be stereotypical Russia but liberal btw)

Triple allience wrote:Goodbye to you all

Why?

Arestastland wrote:
No, it means to mass kill people of the same origins.

Okey thx for the info

Arestastland wrote:
Why?

Im exiting for now  what did you think i didnt write thanks for everything

Triple allience wrote:Does not genocide mean killing a whole race ?

What defines a genocide is the intent to do so, in part or in whole, along with actions done in line with that intent, which are not necessarily murder as things like deportations (ethnic cleansing) and forced sterilization are far more often than not actions done with said intent.

Shouldn't have sent that telegram.

Triple allience wrote:Im exiting for now  what did you think i didnt write thanks for everything

Bye bue

Three Galaxies wrote:Shouldn't have sent that telegram.

uh oh

Three Galaxies wrote:Shouldn't have sent that telegram.

Tell me more.

Syndicasia wrote:Putin absolutely would've supported integrating Russia with the West as he did when he first got power lol

Yes, and this is why I can’t support him. Putin was a Western sympathizer, and now he wants to act like the hero of the East?

Syndicasia wrote:Peasants struggle against the old ruling classes of the aristocracy and monarchy as they aspire to become free rural petty bourgeoisie themselves, which is what happened under Maoist China.

Then why did Makhno embrace other cultures while Mao wanted everything related to culture burned down? Doesn't seem very maoist

Kreushia wrote:
uh oh

No, it's nothing inappropriate, I just think I sent it to the wrong person.

Jewish Partisan Division wrote:Then why did Makhno embrace other cultures while Mao wanted everything related to culture burned down? Doesn't seem very maoist

Culture and tradition is a bane on society that only holds us back.

«12. . .27,55927,56027,56127,56227,56327,56427,565. . .28,21328,214»

Advertisement