The Rejected RealmsBoard

Jewish Partisan Division wrote:

That's a very capitalist way of thinking synd.

Materialist*
Also, I believe I said already that economic relations are the root of all other social relations

Jewish Partisan Division wrote:

Deleting that post as it was horribly phrased, give me five minutes

when post phrase so bad had to deleted it 😹😹😹😹😹😹

Three Galaxies wrote:

Eradicating culture and religion is a good way of making people less human. That way, ideology is the only thing in life that matters.

"One nation, one people, one leader."

Eradicating religion will not make people less human. It will, in fact, bring them closer together.

"One humanity, one Party, one economy"

Wonsen wrote:

Culture is the holding back of societal progress in favor of archaic views. The things you mentioned are innovations only possible by Science, the ultimate enemy of Culture. Plus, when I say “culture” I primarily mean traditional and old ways of thinking.

Define culture, then.
Explain how it's eraticatable, or how that would be beneficial. Or how it somehow opposes science.
I don't think you realize the fact that we wouldn't have science if it wasn't for culture.

Arestastland wrote:

Religion is fundamental, dude. It wouldn't make any sense to wipe it out.

We do need to wipe out religion—but only temporarily. Clinging to these centuries old religions like Christianity and Islam is leading to more hate and pain in the world (as their outdated opinions are used to justify things like homophobia and transphobia), so if we dismantle the Old Faiths and replace them with new ones, they will be shaped to the world around them.

That shaping means they will most likely be more tolerant and progressive than the Old Faiths, and thus can be a tool to support us rather than oppress us.

“Everyone that disagrees with me is a fascist; anyway let me continue explaining why Hitler was justified.”

Is basically what a lot of arguments boil down to.

Arctic Lands wrote:

Eradicating religion will not make people less human. It will, in fact, bring them closer together.

"One humanity, one Party, one economy"

Eradicating diversity will not make people less human. It will, in fact, bring them closer together.
A boring togetherness, but a togetherness nonetheless.

Wonsen wrote:

Culture is unneeded. It serves as a way to blockade societal progress. While I think that architectural and lingual culture is good, religious and social culture should be dismantled in favor of Progressive Secular ideals.

That's a form of culture, and your plan is to force onto people who disagree with it. This is just western thinking applied to leftist politics. We cannot rank cultures as it misses the point on why people are in cultures. People join religions because they provide a clear source of morals to follow. However, some may find this aspect of religion too confining or may just disagree with the morals that the religion teaches and will leave. My point is you can dislike aspects of a culture while also admitting that there are aspects of a culture others would like to keep having and not be taken away from an alleged "greater good."

Toerana wrote:

why do you need any of that stuff when you can good, old, feudalism. Return to the Medieval Period right folks?

Agreed, literally us here.

A Traditional, First ever Type of Monarchy!

All this New Stuff like Anarchy, Fascism and Democracy are absurd!

Altasund wrote:

Eradicating diversity will not make people less human. It will, in fact, bring them closer together.
A boring togetherness, but a togetherness nonetheless.

Eradicating fascism will not make people less human. It will, in fact, bring them closer together.
A boring togetherness, but a togetherness nonetheless.

Wonsen wrote:

No, my views are easily understandable because they have been achieved before, in Mao’s China. Look at China now, a beacon of secular and modern ways of thinking, as opposed to the traditional, religion-influenced West.

PFFFT the German Democratic Republic, Bulgarian People's Republic, USSR and even post-Mao China can all be considered to be infinitely better at what you brag about Maoist China being (progressive in social and economic relations)

Tungstan wrote:

We do need to wipe out religion—but only temporarily. Clinging to these centuries old religions like Christianity and Islam is leading to more hate and pain in the world (as their outdated opinions are used to justify things like homophobia and transphobia), so if we dismantle the Old Faiths and replace them with new ones, they will be shaped to the world around them.

That shaping means they will most likely be more tolerant and progressive than the Old Faiths, and thus can be a tool to support us rather than oppress us.

woah, where'd you get those views from?
Instead of destroying old faith , we could rewrite their sacred books to be, a little Neutral.

Jewish Partisan Division wrote:

That's a form of culture, and your plan is to force onto people who disagree with it. This is just western thinking applied to leftist politics. We cannot rank cultures as it misses the point on why people are in cultures. People join religions because they provide a clear source of morals to follow. However, some may find this aspect of religion too confining or may just disagree with the morals that the religion teaches and will leave. My point is you can dislike aspects of a culture while also admitting that there are aspects of a culture others would like to keep having and not be taken away from an alleged "greater good."

I like cultures. I dislike “culture”, the word that is used as an umbrella term by Maoists to mean religion and traditional societal structures. I would’ve used a different word is “culture” wasn’t already established.