«12. . .77,80177,80277,80377,80477,80577,80677,807. . .79,79879,799»
I could make them part of the navy, but that wouldn’t be much better now would it?
A tank is just a very large can.
You're thinking about MBTs I'm thinking of what they shove propane into.
I mean, you just described half of all Val's wars ever...
Funny story I: hogsweed is phototoxic. It requires very strong lighting - like sunlight - to do it's dirty work. Otherwise it's significantly more mild than you might assume.
Pineapples digest you, apple trees have enough cyanide to kill an adult human, bananas are radioactive and cause hallucinations, green potatoes do the nightshade thing to people, rhubarb has enough oxalate in it to form kidney stones, caffeine in coffee is more toxic than either arsenic OR hydrogen chloride, oh and taro root has fvcking sharp needles in it when raw.
Why not just open friendly relations? You still get most of the benefits, just without the backlash.
Not really, but we do make alot of excess,
Being a fairly small nation and All, and if you have some good relationships with us, you will most likely get some pretty good discounts
Myehn, Karcovshkie, and Osmauri
You've never heard of the term "fluid tank" before?
Like a water tank? Fuel tank?
well, we spend the least money on our marine force, about 15% on them, the air force gets about 40% and the Navy gets 45% so it would be easier to have some of the extra money that the Air Force has to operating and maintaining our tanks
Hence why our tanks are under the Air Force
Myehn and Karcovshkie
just cut some spending from the air force and move it to the marines
or just merge the marines into the navy and give the navy the tanks
speaking of this want sum trade
Sorry?
Also Ci Arovannea, what was that rp you wanted to do?
Paziano and Ci Arovannea
Sure, got any ideas on what you want?
Myehn and Karcovshkie
Fun Vic3 Facts:
If the USA becomes a British dominion, they are capable of Confederation with the Canadian dominions.
On the "Prevention of Hate Crime" resolution up for vote at the World Assembly:
I believe that section 1 of the resolution is unnecessary, and that motivation for a crime should not matter in regard to sentencing.
While I believe that our nations should address hate, this is the wrong way to go about it.
I would advise voting against this resolution and instead proposing one that addresses the government's role in discrimination, as section 2 of the current resolution does, while also proposing a general anti-harassment law to provide a punitively fair solution to hate speech.
Post self-deleted by Rhinesburg.
Childhood is thinking that Batman is the good guy.
Adolescence is thinking that The Joker is the good guy.
Adulthood is realizing that Commissioner Gordon doesn't get paid enough to deal with either.
Pakitsk, Lointland, Order of the Saint Dumas, Myehn, and 7 othersAuthRight Authoritarianism, Paziano, West Pangasinan, The Holy Rat, Osmauri, Phaedelia, and Rhinesburg
«12. . .77,80177,80277,80377,80477,80577,80677,807. . .79,79879,799»
Advertisement