by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .79,36879,36979,37079,37179,37279,37379,374. . .79,74579,746»

Love Peace and Friendship wrote:In the need to get the true sapphic in experience...

what

Levantin wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Point

Man, give me a tldr.

Levantin wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Point

I want to make a fictional world where these wayword philosophers are correct just to see the consequences.

Arctic Lands wrote:2.4% of US GDP? All managed by a couple people with computers? Impossible, it's not supposed to work!

Why does Walmart have an incentive to create good products or keep prices manageable? Because it actually has competitors. The government has no competitors and therefore has no incentive to be efficient or good for the people.

Liberatarianism wrote:How is it private property if the government can confiscate it at any moment?

You can use it for profit, sell or rent it out. That's property. And it was only confiscated from huge owners to then give to smaller peasants.

Ugh… corporatism? On this RMB?

Paziano wrote:Well, it’s a whole accelerationist thing. We should be Italian, but the regime here wants to bring back Sumerian culture because they were “divinely inspired” to do so.

Aaaaagain that makes, I think, no sense. But good on you Paz, would you like raw or well done?

Arctic Lands wrote:You can use it for profit, sell or rent it out. That's property. And it was only confiscated from huge owners to then give to smaller peasants.

I don’t think you understand the point of private property. If I own a house in a capitalist system the government can’t take away my house unless I commit crimes like tax evasion. If I own a house in Maoist China they can take away my house anytime they want and then send me to the fields.

Liberatarianism wrote:Why does Walmart have an incentive to create good products or keep prices manageable? Because it actually has competitors. The government has no competitors and therefore has no incentive to be efficient or good for the people.

You're missing the point. I'm saying that it's already possible to plan out large economic structures. And it's not like communism has a government. It has workers producing things for each other for use, not for profit. Incentive is there to work for a common good (yes, human nature allows that since changing social conditions will influence it)

Liridia wrote:Aaaaagain that makes, I think, no sense. But good on you Paz, would you like raw or well done?

I prefer medium-rare

Love Peace and Friendship wrote:In the need to get the true sapphic in experience...

Trust me, purple toga gold bling? All the ladies (or guys) (or other) will be falling head over heels.

Love Peace and Friendship wrote:I blame Osmauri

now idk about the Teilhard stuff but this def is a violation of Church teaching lol 😭

Paziano wrote:I prefer medium-rare
Trust me, purple toga gold bling? All the ladies (or guys) (or other) will be falling head over heels.

Cool cool, I’ll notify the Devil so that when I send you down there again he’ll know just how to cook ya.

Liberatarianism wrote:I don’t think you understand the point of private property. If I own a house in a capitalist system the government can’t take away my house unless I commit crimes like tax evasion. If I own a house in Maoist China they can take away my house anytime they want and then send me to the fields.

The point of private property is protecting the surplus value the ruling class has alienated from the exploited class. This is an all-encompassing claim, including slavery, feudalism and capitalism.

Arctic Lands wrote:You're missing the point. I'm saying that it's already possible to plan out large economic structures. And it's not like communism has a government. It has workers producing things for each other for use, not for profit. Incentive is there to work for a common good (yes, human nature allows that since changing social conditions will influence it)

And your using Walmart, a microscopic portion of the real economy completely based in one sector that actually has competitors, to justify a complete national economy run by the government.

Liberatarianism wrote:Communists genuinely believing that a couple of government bureaucrats can manage an economy based on billions of decisions and transactions

I mean, depending on how technology will be in the future, might be feasible, but once again for the time being lets let the people decide where and how they procure their needs (of course abiding by local regulations).

Liridia wrote:Cool cool, I’ll notify the Devil so that when I send you down there again he’ll know just how to cook ya.

I don’t believe in such trivial beings, only glorious sacrifice for a cause followed by eternal blackness.

(NOT TRUE IRL)

Are you nerds still fighting over this?
Touch grass.

Liberatarianism wrote:And your using Walmart, a microscopic portion of the real economy completely based in one sector that actually has competitors, to justify a complete national economy run by the government.

Do you even read what I write? Be a little more thoughtful about it. I said there will be no government!

Levantin wrote:now idk about the Teilhard stuff but this def is a violation of Church teaching lol 😭

Well, I don't act on it, and that's all I can really do.

I guess my situation is annoying, but such is life.

Maneiras wrote:I mean, depending on how technology will be in the future, might be feasible, but once again for the time being lets let the people decide where and how they procure their needs (of course abiding by local regulations).

This tech already exists and is actively used in large companies!

«12. . .79,36879,36979,37079,37179,37279,37379,374. . .79,74579,746»

Advertisement