by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .27,51427,51527,51627,51727,51827,51927,520. . .27,99227,993»

Teius therche wrote:I just think there is no real democracy. It just seems to be a circus but the same people behind the scenes are in charge


A country where the people vote for who's in charge, is definitly more democratic than an autocratic state lol

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

Teius therche wrote:I'm saying they are both the same. One just dresses it up

doesnt autocratic states have forms n hints of dictatorship

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

Teius therche wrote:I'm saying there is no such thing as a true democracy in reality. The people you vote for keep switching but the puppet master is always the same.

eh maybe in america but yh, lotta countries there are big changes after each election

Teius therche wrote:Time to get back to work. Sorry that's TL:DR

I don't think I was asking for your opinion, friend. If you do not have anything to add or respond with, it would be in your best interest to not respond.

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

Teius therche wrote:And it always comes out those changes were made to help some lobbyist for a company or a corrupt politician

Give an example of that in a scandinavian event

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

Teius therche wrote:Really? I am not looking to get into like a debate me bro thing here. I have no problem with us having a disagreement. But me finding one incident would not prove my point. That would just be a logical fallacy

I know man and i aint tryna debate, but my point is u cant make claims with 0 things to back ur claim up with

I’m very good at making things less confusing
“Let me know if the consciousness in your brain starts cognitive phenomenology about a section of the memorandum that your brain doesn’t have the intelligence capacity on this concept to comprehend the question
If that happens I can help”

Kanokla wrote:
I appreciate you taking the time to respond to such a controversial question.

I have been trying to stay away from reading on the subject to protect my own mental health, so I am not as well versed on the war as I should be. But I do know that there will be some difficult concessions will be neccesary if we are serious about stopping the bloodshed. Crimea is for sure off the table for the time being and definitely the Russian speaking majority territories. It isn't right that warmongering in the 21st century allows a nation to gain territory, and I am personally conflicted on the West's response.

Putin is very obviously behind the scenes funding the far right and enabling destablization in the liberal democracies in the west and I think he wants to see how far he can get away with annexing foreign territory. I have a strong instinct (which I hope is wrong) that he'll do the same tactic in Moldova if he "wins" in Ukraine. I am very conflicted because it is extremely sad seeing hundreds of thousands of casualties, but I also have the opinion that we should go all in and make a stand that warmongering is not acceptable in this century and give Ukraine all the support it needs in equipment and humanitarian aid and make it hurt for them if they wish to continue their expansion. War is evil though. And there are so many young men and women that are losing their chances on having a healthy life because of the will of a minority of old geezers. It is all-around a depressing a bleak topic. And that is an understatement.

In regards to your election concerns, do you really feel like Putin could be voted out by regular Russian citizens if the election was fair? From my understandings from what little I have read, it sounds like most Russians are content with the current status quo as long as their is still food on the table and their personal lives change little.

I obviously don't have an easy answer as well if not describing it as muddy and uninformed, but if there was an easy answer, the international community would have executed the solution immediately. I hope you continue to be safe where you are at.

I don’t think Putin would go beyond Ukraine to be honest. But it’s fair to note I was quite sure he wouldn’t go to Ukraine either; until the very first morning of the war. I thought he’s smarter than that :/

Moldova have some advantage now to get ready for such possible escalation. And so do Armenia and Georgia. Other than that, there’s not a big list of where Putin can go with similar ease. But Transnistria is a tricky asset for his politics nonetheless

As for elections: yes. The real life behind internet and media is quite different. While his propaganda works and works very well (he gains more support, especially among the poorest classes of society) people aren’t in that majority as Kremlin tries to display. Everything which doesn’t align with his course is brutally silenced so it’s very convenient for his propaganda to look realistic, until you go out and see the real life in stores, at work places, on business meetings etc etc. I love to see this, what I call, silent protest where people express themselves in creative ways to avoid being fined or jailed for anti war activity or stances

I think they’ll fabricate the results like 80%+ in his support, or even more. Those old farts don’t even get it that in a real election the percentage for winners is usually much lower. Putin winning with 51% is more realistic than him winning with 99% lmao but the rednecks would still eat and swallow the latter result. A lot of his supporters remind me of mad religious cultists and that’s honestly frightening, such people are not able to negotiate (because that requires critical thinking first)

But in case of a full scale war against Russia the entire nation will fight for Russia even if they oppose Putin. They’d fight for their families and homes, and that’s another reason why betting on Russians to overthrow him under a big war threat is also wrong. Putin ≠ Russia and average folks will protect their home, not the leader

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

Teius therche wrote:I was just stating my opinion casually and on a more philosophical level. Trying to prove it by naming incidents then I would have to prove causation and correlation between multiple incidents between a single entity and every nation in the world.

Why would u need to prove every single one when im asking you to mention a single one and you dont even have to prove it

Card apocalypse is in 4 hours!!!! Sooo exciting

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:Why would u need to prove every single one when im asking you to mention one and you dont even have to prove it

Teius therche wrote:I was just stating my opinion casually and on a more philosophical level. Trying to prove it by naming incidents then I would have to prove causation and correlation between multiple incidents between a single entity and every nation in the world.

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:I know man and i aint tryna debate, but my point is u cant make claims with 0 things to back ur claim up with

Teius therche wrote:If it is not kept to the philiophical realm then I have to. I sated "in reality no true democracy exists"

Teius therche wrote:Really? I am not looking to get into like a debate me bro thing here. I have no problem with us having a disagreement. But me finding one incident would not prove my point. That would just be a logical fallacy

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:Give an example of that in a scandinavian event

(Self Deleted)
(Self Deleted)

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:eh maybe in america but yh, lotta countries there are big changes after each election

Teius therche wrote:I'm saying there is no such thing as a true democracy in reality. The people you vote for keep switching but the puppet master is always the same.

Teius therche wrote:I'm saying there is no such thing as a true democracy in reality. The people you vote for keep switching but the puppet master is always the same.

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:doesnt autocratic states have forms n hints of dictatorship

Teius therche wrote:I'm saying they are both the same. One just dresses it up

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:A country where the people vote for who's in charge, is definitly more democratic than an autocratic state lol

Teius therche wrote:I just think there is no real democracy. It just seems to be a circus but the same people behind the scenes are in charge

(Self Deleted)

Teius therche wrote:Why be a democracy? Be the autocratic states

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:im js goin off scandinavian politics rlly

AND MORE AND MORE

PLEASE CAN YOU MOVE THIS TO TELEGRAMS????
its hurting me

Post self-deleted by Teius therche.

please do not send me a telegram

Lagene wrote:
(Self Deleted)
(Self Deleted)
(Self Deleted)AND MORE AND MORE
PLEASE CAN YOU MOVE THIS TO TELEGRAMS????
its hurting me

Ya any 1 to 1 conversations on the RMB 5 or more post long without any other nations expect for 2 should be moved to Telegrams
This should be added to the RMB rules

The Democratic States of Scandinavia wrote:please do not send me a telegram

Why are you saying this on the RMB? You acknowledge the fact that there is telegram, but you’re asking on the RMB for the nation not send you a telegram
If you want to continue this conversation without the use of telegrams, make alts move them to a region and continue the conversation there please don’t clog up Europe’s RMB

Bro it aint dat deep i just told him not to in one single sentence

Teius therche you good?
In the past 10 hours you have deleted 21 posts
In the last 10 hours I don’t think I seen 1 posts from you that isn’t by now deleted

Why is o and p beside each other on the keyboard if you are writing NP and accidentally click o instead of p then it would say NO in caps
And would cause a lot of confusion and confusion

«12. . .27,51427,51527,51627,51727,51827,51927,520. . .27,99227,993»

Advertisement